now dats a dampner!!!!

After the emphatic win over the pakistan team in the T20 finals india made a positive start to the future cup first odi.As the match proceeded india was brilliant.sreesanth our kerla fire again took the most dangerous man MATTY.HAYDEN.Gilchrist too was out for a low score because of a spectacular catch by yuvraj singh. Then came the biggest partner ship between Michael clark and Brad haddin.clark went on to score a 130.australia was saved by some sensible batting by clark.at the end james hopes made a 25 ball 37 which helped the aussies to reach the 300 mark.

At last the world champions went on to make 307 from 50 overs at 6.14 rpo.

	Australia innings (50 overs maximum)			R	M	B	4s	6s	SR
		AC Gilchrist	c Yuvraj Singh b Khan	12	11	11	2	0	109.09
		ML Hayden	b Sreesanth	34	75	39	5	1	87.17
		BJ Hodge	lbw b Sreesanth	0	6	5	0	0	0.00
		MJ Clarke	run out (Khan)	130	202	132	10	3	98.48
		A Symonds	lbw b Sreesanth	7	11	7	1	0	100.00
		BJ Haddin	st Dhoni b Yuvraj Singh	69	99	83	7	1	83.13
		JR Hopes	c Tendulkar b Khan	37	31	25	4	0	148.00
		B Lee	not out	0	1	0	0	0	-
		Extras	(b 4, lb 1, w 11, nb 2)	18
		Total	(7 wickets; 50 overs; 221 mins)	307	(6.14 runs per over)

Regarding the indian bowling I.pathan and sreesanth was decent.Then came the indians batting.Early damage was done by Mitchell johnson because he took Tendulkar in his first over.
Every body was praying for some asssistance from god.But it was in the form of rain.The whole day was washed away by the rain.At the end the match was abandoned due to rain.Thats how the first match of the series met a sad ending to both the teams.

Im looking forward to the rest of the matches hope the left out actions be filled through the rest of the matches.

COST EFFECTIVE WEB SITE MARKETING

If you are a person who is interested in making your website a popular one you are provided with 2 options one is to pay for it to Google ads and the other is Web Site Marketing. If you want better returns I would rather suggest you to go in for a specialist who helps you in this matter. Now, you can outsource your work or hire a specialist to do the work. The former one is more cost effective since it is run systematically and you can expect better returns for your money. One such company is USweb which provides you with complete service for a competitive price. The costs are always reasonable with their kind of service they deliver and the expertise they deliver. They also work with small and medium companies and they also find their prices very reasonable. The biggest advantage that we get by working with them is the level of attention we get from them. I will bet they are the one of the best in cost effective web site marketing and I am sure that you will surely be benefited by getting associated with them.

ever wondered wats inside your computer system

here is a small diagrammatic explanation of your system
Multicore CPUs like Intel's Core 2 Extreme and AMD's dual-core Athlon 64 have brought about better performance, better power management, and a way for the industry to free itself from a slavish devotion to sheer clock speed. But multicore CPU architectures are creating a nightmare for programmers, particularly those who want to take full advantage of the new chips' power. The upshot? Much of your brand-new CPU's potential, like an uneducated brain, is going to waste. Even if (programmers) did nothing and the clock speed doubled, their software would run significantly faster, the days when the megahertz wars raged.

In general, "multicore" chips include two or more cores -- the central processing units of a chip on a single piece of silicon. This allows properly coded software to break computing tasks down into separate pieces, known as "threads," and process the threads simultaneously, in parallel, instead of sequentially, as older single-core chips require. Although multicore platforms have been around for some time in academia and research, it's been just over two years since the chips were commercially introduced by the likes of Sun Microsystems, IBM, Intel and AMD. Now, as core counts are poised to take off with eight, 32 and even 64 cores, the software that will run on them is seriously lagging. With the exception of the gaming industry, the vast majority of software publishers aren’t programming for multithreaded chips.Indeed, the potential benefits of multicore chips are rendered obsolete if the software itself isn't coded to take advantage of its primary selling point: namely, parallelism.